Skip to content
chandrakantha.com > Indian Music and Dance > Indian Classical Music > Hindustani Sangeet > History of North Indian Music

History of North Indian Music

Quick Navigation
Overview (this page)
The Tawaif, the Anti–Nautch Movement, and the Development of North Indian Classical Music
Gharana
Sitar
Contemporary Indian Music and the Vedas

Introduction

Their are a variety of worldview in India. (A friend once jokingly said that there were the “three Ms – Marx, Macaulay, and Maharishi”.) It is not surprising that there are a multiplicity of historical narratives. For the purpose of this webpage we will take two perspectives on the development of North Indian music. The first section will approach the subject from a historically verifiable perspective. The second second will approach the subject from a Hindu mythological perspective.

The reason that we are taking this approach is simple. An objective approach gives a picture which is much closer to historical reality, but it fails to put things in a cultural perspective. Conversely the mythological approach shows the cultural significance very clearly, even if it falls short of historical accuracy.



Objective Approach

There are many impor­tant ev­ents in the his­tory of In­dian music.  These milestones show clearly the development of mus­ical thought from early his­tory to the pres­ent day.

EARLY HISTORY – The early his­tory of In­dian music may be explained by the Indo-European theory.  Ac­cor­ding to this theory, there was a cul­ture, or group of cul­tures who were so suc­cess­ful that they spread throughout Europe and parts of Asia.  Although no one knows where they came from, pres­ent thought tends to place their origins somewhere in Eurasia, either north of the Black sea or north of the Caspian (Mallory 1989).  Within this family there are seve­ral major groups.  Indo-Aryan is a group which has special sig­nifi­cance for India be­cause this is the language and cul­ture which generated the Vedas and other classical texts of ancient India.  The classical music of India is said to have its roots in this cul­ture.

The con­nec­tion bet­ween Indo-European expansion and In­dian music may be seen in mythology.  Mythology refers to music be­ing brought to the peo­ple of India from a place of celestial be­ings.  This mythical land (Gandharva Desh) is us­ually equated with heaven.  How­ever, some are of the opinion that this mythical land could ac­tually be Kandahar in what is the modern Afghanistan.  There­fore, the myths of music be­ing given to the world by the celestial be­ings (gandharva) may ac­tually re­pre­sent a cul­tural con­nec­tion with this ancient Indo-Aryan homeland.

Further evidence may be seen in mus­ical struc­ture.  In the first few centu­ries B.C.E., In­dian music was based upon seven modes (scales).  It is prob­ably no coincidence that Greek music was also based upon seven modes.  Fur­ther­more, the In­dian scales follow the same pro­cess of modulation (murchana) that was found in ancient Greek music.  Since Greece is also Indo-European, this is an­other piece of evidence for the Indo-European con­nec­tion.

VEDAS – The link to Sanskrit is an­other strong in­di­ca­tion of Indo-European roots.  Many of the ear­liest texts were writ­ten in Sanskrit.  It is also gen­erally believed that classical music is der­ived from the Samaveda.  How­ever it should be stressed that this belief is hard to justify be­cause intermediate forms have never been found. (more info.)

In the final analysis, the roots of classical music be­ing Indo-European are a ref­lec­tion of modern paradigms con­cerning ancient In­dian his­tory.  Although sup­porting evidence may be slim, conflicting evidence is conspicuous by its ab­sence.  Until we are faced with sig­ni­fi­cant conflicting evidence we should accept the Indo-European theory.

NATYASHASTRA – The nature of music in prehistoric India may be obscure, but the pic­ture begins to be­come clear in the first few centu­ries B.C.E.  In particular the Natyashastra stands out as a major text of this period.

The Natyashastra is the oldest surviving text on stagecraft in the world.  It is believed to have been writ­ten by Bharata Muni bet­ween 200 C.E and 200 B.C.E.  How­ever there are scholars who believe that it may have been writ­ten by var­ious authors at dif­fer­ent times.

It is believed that the Natyashastra is based upon the much older Natya Sutras.  Unfor­tunately there are no surviving copies of the Natya Sutras.

The Natyashastra is incredibly wide in its scope.  It covers stage-design, music, dance, makeup, vir­tually every aspect of stagecraft.  It is very impor­tant to the musician be­cause it is the only text which gives such de­tail about the music and instruments of the period.

JATI – During the time of the Natyashastra , the basis for the music was referred to, as “jati”. The word literally means a “collection” or a “caste”; but in the musical sense it means “mode”. (This definition should not be confused with the jati of our rhythmic theory, nor should it be confused with the number of notes in a rag.) The texts describe seven shuddha jati which were “pure modal forms”. These modes were linked by a process of modulation (murchana). There were an additional 11 vikrit-jati (“mixed modal forms”) which were not linked in such a simple fashion.

We do not know much about the style, but it is clear that it was distinct from the rag. This is indicated by the fact that the jati enjoyed some degree of popularity for some centuries after the introduction of rag. Furthermore, from a theoretical standpoint, the jati allowed a diminished 5th (i.e., komal pancham), while rags do not. (more information on jati.)

BRIHADDESHI – The first millennium provides us with seve­ral texts which show the evolu­tion of In­dian music.  The Brihaddeshi writ­ten by Matanga (circa 700 C.E.) is very impor­tant.  It is in this work that we first find the word “rag” men­tioned.  How­ever, there is some doubt whether the con­cept was the same as it is today.  Another impor­tant text is the “Sangeet Ratnakar” by Sharangdev.  This work, writ­ten around the thirteenth cen­tury, gives ex­ten­sive commentaries about nu­mer­ous mus­ical styles that existed at that time.

MEDIEVAL PERIOD – Perhaps one of the most sig­ni­fi­cant milestones in the development of In­dian music was the life of Amir Khusru (Bhatkhande 1934)(born circa 1253C.E., died 1325C.E.).  There is a tendency among In­dians to attribute the development of al­most every­thing to him.  He is erroneously re­fer­red to as the inventor of the sitar and tabla and nu­mer­ous mus­ical forms which did not develop un­til many centu­ries after his death.  Although the ex­tent of his con­tri­bution to In­dian music is more legendary than factual, he nevertheless symbolises a cru­cial tur­ning point in the development of In­dian music.  Amir Khusru is an icon re­pre­senting a growing Persian influence on the music.  This influence was felt to a greater ex­tent in the North than in the South.  The consequence of this differing degree of influence ultimately re­sulted in the bifurcation of In­dian music into two distinct sys­tems; the Hindustani sangeet of the North and the Carnatic sangeet of the South.

Tansen

The mus­ical career of Tansen is an­other landmark in the development of In­dian Music (Mital 1960).  He is sig­ni­fi­cant be­cause he symbolises the maturing of the north In­dian sys­tem as a distinct entity from south In­dian music.

MODERN PERIOD – The eighteenth cen­tury marks the birth of many of the mus­ical forms that we think of today.  Dadra, kheyal, thumri and a host of other forms are traceable to this period.  Sadarang, and Adarang are two men who have made par­ti­cu­lar con­tri­butions in this mat­ter. (The history of the kheyal is interesting in its on right.)

The early part of the 20th cen­tury brings the most recent re­vo­lu­tion in north In­dian music.  This is provide by two peo­ple: V. N. Bhatkhande and V. D. Paluskar.  These two men re­vo­lu­tionised the con­cept of In­dian music.  Paluskar is re­spon­sible for the introduction of the first music colleges while Bhatkhande is re­spon­sible for the introduction of an organised sys­tem which ref­lects cur­rent performance practice.  Both men are also re­spon­sible for the development and pop­ularisation of a modern musical notation.

In the preceding sec­tion we have given a fair description of the In­dian con­cept of Sangeet.  This threefold art-form of vocal music, instrumental music and dance, provides the foundation for the classical arts in India.  As in any art, the ultimate goal is the emotional quality.  The primary mus­ical vehicle for the conveyance of this emotion is rag.



Mythological Origins of Sangeet

We must look at mythology to really see the sig­nifi­cance that In­dian music (sangeet) has to In­dian so­ciety.   This is easily il­lus­tra­ted in the story con­cerning its origin. Perhaps the clearest mythological raison de etre may be found in Bharata’s Natyashastra (Rangacharya 1966):

Once, a long time ago, du­ring the transitional period bet­ween two Ages it so hap­pened that peo­ple took to uncivilised ways, were ruled by lust and greed, behaved in angry and jealous ways with each other and not only gods but demons, evil spirits, yakshas and and such like others swarmed over the earth.  Seeing this plight, Indra and other gods ap­proached god Brahma and requested him to give the peo­ple a toy (Kridaniyaka), but one which could not only be seen but heard and this should turn out a diversion (so that peo­ple gave up their bad ways)

Although it was de­cided to give the celestial art of sangeet to mankind, a suitable human had to be found who was capable of re­ceiving this gift.  Sangeet had al­ways been in the realm of the demigods (gandharva.  A super-human of su­per­ior spiritual ab­ility was re­quired to convey this celestial art-form to the world of man.  It fell upon the great sage Narada to be the first mortal recipient of this divine art.  Through Narada, we are indebted for the pre­sence of classical music.

WHAT IS SANGEET? – Sangeet is a word which doesn’t really translate into Eng­lish.  In its most ge­ne­ral sense it is con­si­dered synon­ymous with the term “music”; how­ever it is ac­tually a threefold art-form of vocal music, instrumental music, and dance.  Since classical dance is also a compo­nent, it is not stric­tly synon­ymous to the Western term “music”.

There is a historical rea­son why sangeet is composed of these three art-forms.  In the Vedic and post Vedic period it was customary to perform mythological dramas.  These dramas used dan­cers to mime the story, instrumentalists to play the mus­ical accompaniment, and vocalists to tell and sing the story.

There is a standard terminology whenever one wishes to be specific.  Dance is re­fer­red to as “nritya“, vocal is re­fer­red to as “gayaki”, and instrumental is known as “vadhya sangeet”.

GURU / SHISHYA SYSTEM – The introduction of this art-form to the mortal world was only the first step.  Traditional pedagogy had to accommodate it.  Classical music is con­si­dered more than mere enter­tain­ment; it is a moral and spiritual redeemer.  There­fore, the divine qualities inherent in the art-form imply cer­tain prerequisites; key among them are guru, vinaya and sadhana (Shankar 1968).  This translates to teacher, humility, and discipline.  The guru, or teacher is the most impor­tant prerequisite in trad­itional mus­ical pedagogy.  Music is said to be a guru mukha-vidhya (i.e., knowledge which must come from a teacher).  This is con­si­dered the highest form of knowledge. 

Traditional pedagogy is based upon the transfer of knowledge from the teacher (guru) to the disciple (shishya or shagird) in an unbroken trad­ition (parampara) (Courtney 1980).  The trad­ition of guru-shishya-parampara extends back countless millennia. The se­cond prerequisite is vinaya (humility).  This also ref­lects the divine origins of the art-form.  Classical music is said to be a worship that involves both the listener and the artist alike.  Any negative emotions such as arrogance (abhiman) be­comes an impediment.  This is an impediment from both the divine aspect as well as a mat­ter of simple pedagogy (e.g., “If you think you al­ready know every­thing, then what is there to learn?”)  The final prerequisite for a student of classical music is sadhana (discipline and practice). Sadhana is neces­sary at two levels.  At one level, the divine origins of the art-form require that the student “be prepared” to be a recipient of this knowledge.  How­ever, from a simple pedagogic stand­point, the music is so incredibly dif­fi­cult that if the student does not devote countless hours of practice spread over many years, the student cer­tainly will not be able to master the music.

CHARACTERISTICS – This may clarify many points of pedagogy, but what about the art-form it­self?  Any art must deal with the topic of aesthetics.  The In­dian trad­ition has much to say on this point as well.

The Nine Moods (Nava Rasa)
Shringar – Love
Hasya – Comic
Karuna – Sadness
Raudra – Furious
Veera – Heroic
Bhayanak – Terrible
Vibhats – Disgusting
Adbhuta – Wonderment
Shanta – Peace

RAG – This acoustic vehicle is known as ragRag may be thought of as the melodic foundation upon which classical In­dian music is based.  During the last few centu­ries it was customary to anthropomorphise the rag in the form of gandharvas (demigods) and apsaras (celestial nymphs).

The divine quality of music is perhaps best il­lus­tra­ted in nad siddha.  This is the ab­ility to perform miracles by sing­ing or play­ing cer­tain rags.  The most fa­mous miracle-working musician was Tansen (Garg 1984).  It is often said that he was able to create fire by sing­ing rag Dipak, or create rain by sing­ing rag Megh Malhar.

We have seen how this art-form is con­si­dered divine.  This divine quality influences con­cepts such as aesthetics and pedagogy.  The reverence that In­dians have for this sys­tem may only be seen in a trad­itional ap­proach.



Selected Video