Skip to content

The con­cept of gharana was peculiar to North In­dian music.  The word “Gharana” literally means “house” and it implies the house of the teacher.  It was linked to the very ancient con­cept of the Guru-Shishya-Parampara (linage of teacher /disciple) but it had some inter­est­ing twists.

The names of the gharanas were al­most al­ways der­ived from a geographical location.  This was us­ually the city, district or state that the founder lived in.  Two examples are the Gwalior Gharana (vocal) or the Farukhabad Gharana (tabla).



The gharana sys­tem as we think of it today was not really very old.  Most of the gharanas began not more than 100-300 years old.  The modern gharanas were gen­erally traceable to the period when the Mogul em­pire col­lapsed.

Gharanas were found throughout the North in every field of dance, vocal and instrumental music.  They tend to be distinct among them­sel­ves.  That is to say that you gen­erally do not find tabla players saying that they are from a vocal gharana or a vocalist claiming to come from a kathak gharana.  This is rea­sonable.  One would not expect an accountant to use his golf skills as and endorsement of his ab­il­ities as an accountant.

In the pro­fes­sional sense a gharana had some of the char­acter­is­tics of a guild.  It was al­ways under­stood that tracing ones linage to a major gharana was a prerequisite for ob­taining a posi­tion in the royal courts.  The gharanas were entrusted with the duty of main­taining a cer­tain standard of music­ianship.

In the ar­tis­tic sense the gharana was somewhat comparable to a “style” or “school”.  Over the years poor trans­por­ta­tion and communication caused the var­ious gharanas to adopt their own par­ti­cu­lar ap­proach to pres­entation, technique and repertoire.

In the 20th cen­tury the gharana sys­tem had a negative im­pact on the standard of music­ianship.  Improvements in communications made it a pro­fes­sional im­pera­tive for music­ians to have as broad of a back­ground as pos­sible.  The secretive nature of the gharana sys­tem coup­led with the fact that gharanas ten­ded to specialise in only one technique or ap­proach was inconsistent with modern pedagogic and pro­fes­sional requirements.  In the end of the 20th cen­tury, music­ians who proclaim loudest that they were “such-and-such” gharana often had the least rounded back­ground.  It is for this rea­son that many of the aspects of this sys­tem were abandoned by modern music colleges in India.

Today the gharana exists in its vestigial form.  Although music­ians routinely declare that they are such and such gharana, it us­ually has no practical meaning.  The loss of royal pat­ron­age coup­led with the loss of ar­tis­tic identity have vir­tually destroyed the sys­tem.