Skip to content

North Indian Vocal form

by David Courtney working tools

Chandra Courtney sing­ing kheyal

Kheyal (a.k.a. “Khyal) has a special place in In­dian music.  The word “kheyal” in Urdu means “idea” or “imagination”.  This term is indicative of its highly improvisational nature.  It is gen­erally an abs­tract and comp­lete pres­entation of the rag;  It is prob­ably the most improvised of the In­dian styles.

There are two major move­ments of kheyal.  There is an ext­remely slow sec­tion which is called vilambit, or bada kheyal: and a fast sec­tion called drut or chotta kheyal.  The vilambit sec­tion is ext­remely slow and us­ually played in ektal of 12 beats.  Occasionally, other tals such as jhumra of 14 beats are heard but this is most rare.  The fast sec­tion is us­ually played in drut tintal or drut ektal.

The instrumental accompaniment to the kheyal is consistent with that of most north Indian classical music. This consists of harmonium, tanpura and tabla. Very often the harmonium is replaced with the sarangi; historically this was the preferred melodic accompaniment.


THESE BOOKS MAY NOT BE FOR YOU
A superficial exposure to music is acceptable to most people; but there is an elite for whom this is not enough. If you have attained certain social and intellectual level, Elementary North Indian Vocal (Vol 1-2) may be for you.

This has compositions, theory, history, and other topics. All exercises and compositions have audio material which may be streamed over the internet for free. It is available in a variety of formats to accommodate every budget.
Are you really ready to step up to the next level? Check your local Amazon.

History

The his­tory of the kheyal (khyal) is pivotal to the development of the modern style of Hindustani classical music.  Previously, the com­mon styles were the dhrupad, and dhammar.  These ear­lier styles were more somber and gen­erally associated with the royal court.

The early development of the kheyal ref­lected a sys­tem of sex­ual segregation; this is known as “pardah”.  In this sys­tem, men and wo­men were kept in separate places in the royal palaces.  The men’s ac­tivi­ties were com­monly held in the royal courts, these are known as “durbar”, while the wo­men were re­le­ga­ted to their quar­ters, which is known as “zanaana”.

Architecture played a surprising role in the development of both the kheyal as well as the dhammar and dhrupad.  The men com­monly sang in the royal courts.  These were big, and had no sound sys­tems, therefore the masculine forms (e.g., dhrupad, dhammar) be­came very loud and devoid of delicacy.  The kheyal was sung in much smaller wo­men’s quar­ters so there was not the necessity to sing so loudly; consequently, the kheyal was able to develop much more delicacy.  Men sing­ing in the royal courts had to deal with very reverberant en­vi­ron­ments, so any attempt to sing very fast material would sim­ply be washed out in the echoes of the durbar.  In contrast, wo­men sing­ing in the smaller zanaanas could explore the full range from slow to fast material.

It is no surprise that kheyal, unfettered by the acoustic constraints of the royal court, should be­come very pop­ular.  How­ever, there were so­cial obstacles which hampered its formal acceptance into the larger sys­tem of North In­dian music.  These obstacles were ref­lected in the gender roles that were part of In­dian so­ciety in that period.

These gender roles were ref­lected in a guild sys­tem known as gharana”.  From the col­lapse of the Mogul em­pire (18th cen­tury) to the time of In­de­pen­dence (1947) these gharanas were impor­tant for such ac­tivi­ties as the allocation of royal pat­ron­age, the definition of ar­tis­tic styles, and the edu­cation of new music­ians to replace those who were lost through sickness and death.  These gharanas main­tained a formalised syllabus that music­ians would use for both performance as well as edu­cational pur­poses.  Such a body of edu­cational material is known as “taleem”.  The gender roles were ref­lected in a simple way.  Until the turn of the 20th cen­tury the teachers were al­most exclusively male, therefore the feminine art-forms were ex­cluded from the formal taleem.

A very sig­ni­fi­cant shift oc­cur­red in the 18th cen­tury.  In this period, men began to sing the kheyal.  This move­ment was spearheaded by two great music­ians.  One of them was Sadarang (1670-1748) and an­other was Adarang (18th cen­tury).  The col­lapse of the gender obstacles heralded the mass acceptance of the kheyal in nor­thern India.

Over the next few centu­ries, a num­ber of gharanas of kheyal would develop.  These were the Gwalior, Agra, Kirana, Jaipur, Rampur, Delhi, Mewati, Bhendi Bazaar, Benares, and Patiyala gharanas.  Each would have its own style and repertoire.

Today, the kheyal is con­si­dered to be the benchmark for North In­dian Classical music.



Selected Video




Other Sites of Interest

Women as a Proposition to Explicit the Esthetic Values of North Indian Classical Vocal Music

Multiple Viewpoint Modeling of North Indian Classical Vocal Compositions

Sonic Performativity: Analysing Gender in North Indian Classical Vocal Music